By Jack Pilkington
In recent days and weeks, the world’s press has become alerted to numerous cases of monkeypox, an apparently ‘rare’ viral disease of African origin, breaking out via widespread transmission for the first time in populations in Europe, North America and Australasia.
To date, combined reports of monkeypox patients out of Britain, the US, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Italy, Germany, Australia and Canada have reached double-digits, whilst municipal experts, like Montreal’s director of public health, Dr. Mylène Drouin, moved quickly to dispel any uncertainty in her office as she told citizens not to ‘panic’.
This, the same doctor who once recommended against eating (of all survivalist instincts to suppress!) on public transport, for fear of ‘putting others at risk’ of Covid. To say it’s an understatement as to how unassured, unsafe and wary many of us have now become of ‘public health experts’ in the aftermath of such vast overreaching and anti-scientific Covid policy, is perhaps putting it a little too lightly.
Indeed, at this point, I’m sure we can all agree that if these same ‘experts’ are now telling us not to panic, it is perhaps time to prepare for panic, such is their two-year-long backlog of unashamed lies and deception.
Deception, I might add, that is already catalogued as being pre-planned.
Enter the fray, Klaus Schwab, founder and geriatric Bond villain stand-in of the World Economic Forum (WEF), a self-declaring ‘International Organisation for Public-Private Cooperation’ that is ‘independent, impartial and not tied to any special interests’, which as unashamed lies and deception goes, may well be the gold standard.
It is Herr Schwab, after all, who has, since 2014, been the key pragmatist behind the notion of a ‘Great Reset’, an initiative of his own mind — emboldened post-Covid — that seeks to overhaul life as we know it through restructuring (dismantling) our current economic system of capitalism in favour of ‘stakeholder capitalism’, whereby ‘private corporations’ are positioned as ‘trustees of society’. This, to Schwab, now the ‘best response to today’s social and environmental challenges’ that we may face.
Because who wouldn’t want a tiny subset of billionaire private equity shareholders dictating you and yours’ everyday direction of travel, right?
Such delusion goes some way to explaining how alien people like Schwab really are, but we mustn’t delude ourselves, either: these people own the game plan.
For six years leading up to the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, the WEF continued to drip-feed into public consciousness that certain worldwide crises could be solved with some kind of ‘reset’, ‘restart’ or ‘reboot’ which would, of course, lead all our faultless, patriotic leaders to ‘build back better’.
At their annual Swiss-based Davos conferences, a man and wife Schwab-sponsored smorgasbord of faceless technocrats, WEF agenda notes are often revealing, with 2014’s rather ominous title, The Reshaping of the World: Consequences for Society, Politics and Business doing its best New World Order impression; in 2015, an in-house WEF article published online headlined, ‘We need to press restart on the global economy’ took centre stage; at their 2016 forum, a panel mused on the question, ‘How to Reboot the Global Economy?’, while in 2017, a prominent theme of their discussions read, ‘We need to reset the global operating system to achieve the SDGs. Here’s how’.
It’s all rather in your face, don’t you think?
An SDG, by the way, is a ‘Sustainable Development Goal’, seventeen of which were written in 2015 as part of the United Nation’s (UN) ‘2030 Agenda’ to ‘transform our world’ by committing to ‘achieving sustainable development in its three dimensions – economic, social and environmental – in a balanced and integrated manner’.
All 193 UN member states (almost the entire world) signed the pact despite none of the populations of said member states ever being asked if, for example, being banned from buying petrol or diesel cars in fifteen years time was something they ever wanted or agreed to.
You see, so long as it’s all packaged and marketed as transformative or developmental, which doesn’t necessarily mean ‘good’, either, democracy doesn’t really count for much to the globalist cartel.
Come 2018 and into 2019, however, the WEF’s vision for the world’s future branches out into more far-reaching escapades and begins to pick up pace, affiliating themselves both with the Gates Foundation (should we be surprised?), and Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security as they war-gamed two separate ‘tabletop exercises’ related to fictional pandemics using various governmental and medical officials as the key responders-cum-players.
The first, a day-long scenario dubbed ‘Clade X’ focusing primarily within the US, started with, according to a WEF report, ‘limited outbreaks in Frankfurt and Caracas of a novel respiratory virus with pandemic potential, and for which there were no effective vaccines or drugs’. In the end, the report continues, ‘the outcome was tragic: the most catastrophic pandemic in history with hundreds of millions of deaths, economic collapse and societal upheaval’.
To counter such misery in the future, six policies are introduced, one of which reads that we must ‘Pioneer a strong and sustainable global health security system…’ which, if you have your head screwed on, is something the World Health Organisation (WHO) announced national signatories to just last year as part of their very own global ‘Pandemic Treaty’.
In October 2019, just a few months before our more-than-familiar Covid-19 travails, a 3.5 hour-long scenario under the name ‘Event 201’ took place in New York which simulated ‘an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic’.
Bats, you say? Where’ve we heard that before…
Similarly, the results are catastrophic, ending with 65 million deaths after 18 months, which must beg the question: How useless are these tabletop ‘expert’ responders?
Interestingly, one of the seven policy ‘recommendations’ here, suggests that ‘Governments and the private sector should assign a greater priority to developing methods to combat mis- and disinformation prior to the next pandemic response’.
Online censorship, of course, a leading takeaway from two years worth of a so-called ‘established’ Covid narrative. No, no, they do not like you thinking at all.
Then, just half a year later, barely a few months into the pandemic, Klaus Schwab, having nurtured his ‘Great Reset’ philosophy for six years, gave it its official ‘launch’ as a hopeful mainstay in world political movements. Conspiracy? No, just fact.
“The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world” — Klaus Schwab, June 3, 2020
Nevertheless, concurrent pandemic simulations, plus the aftereffects of real-time (and real-world) Covid policy destitution, simply weren’t enough to satisfy the seemingly persistent appetites of globalist catastrophism.
In November 2021, pre-Omicron, the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI), a three-time recipient of Gates Foundation donations and an American-based nonprofit that claims to ‘prevent the use and spread of nuclear weapons, nuclear terrorism, and catastrophic biological events’, took things one step further.
Partnered with the Munich Security Conference, an annual forum that discusses international security policy, an additional ‘tabletop exercise’ ensued with the main aim, like its predecessors, to ‘examine gaps in national and international biosecurity and pandemic preparedness’.
Hitting ever harder to home, current news considered, this time the exercise scenario portrayed ‘a deadly, global pandemic involving an unusual strain of monkeypox virus that emerged in the fictional nation of Brinia and spread globally over 18 months’.
Hm. It almost reads like Britain, no? But wait, where was the first case of this current outbreak discovered? Britain. First reported on May 7, with later cases declared on May 14 of this month.
That wouldn’t mean so much, except for the fact that in the scenario itself, the NTI’s own timeline of events places the ‘attack’ (they imagine monkeypox was released as part of a biological terror attack), on May 15 2022.
How oddly coincidental.
Interesting to note, too, is the description of an ‘unusual strain of monkeypox virus’, especially when one considers the prevailing sentiment amongst scientists who believe infection could be sexually transmitted between gay or bisexual men, which has never been seen as a trait in the virus before.
Similarly, the exercise produces five other ‘recommendations’, with one stating:
Develop and institute national-level triggers for early, proactive pandemic response | National governments must adopt a “no-regrets” approach to pandemic response, taking anticipatory action—as opposed to reacting to mounting case counts and fatalities, which are lagging indicators.
In short, a ‘trigger’ is essentially a restrictive action, as they later explain, to ‘slow the spread of the disease to buy time and flatten the epidemiological curve’; remind you of anything? How about lockdowns? A ‘Non-pharmaceutical Intervention’ or NPI such as ‘mask mandates’ or ‘ceasing mass gatherings’, they go on, would also be deemed ‘critical for blocking chains of disease transmission’.
Please notice the ‘no regrets’ vernacular; in other words, governments must implement however much authority and/or oppressive policy they see fit — without regret or thought to anything else — in order to gain control of any potential disease (or population).
Let’s not forget, this was all written during Covid, not beforehand; the desire to reintroduce such measures, then, however useless and destructive they’ve actually been, has always remained on the cards for what appears to be the ‘next’ disease.
Notable, too, is that all three simulations: Clade X, Event 201, and NTI’s biosecurity model, were supported by a group called ‘Open Philanthropy’, another nonprofit with deep roots in Silicon Valley.
And so it is that the virtual has become reality as monkeypox mania takes hold.
So, sure, while it may well be true that Bill Gates — former friend of planetary paedophile, Jeffrey Epstein — not only has form curiously speculating about future smallpox outbreaks ahead of time, or that he recently announced his self-promotional idea for a ‘Global Epidemic Response and Mobilisation’ or ‘GERM’ team (coordinated by the WHO, obviously), or that he also holds ample personal investment in vaccine development, so much, in fact, that pre-Covid he boasted about his $200 billion financial returns at Klaus Schwab’s Davos retreat, just remember that you are a mere conspiracy theorist for distrusting such sinister souls.
And yes, in synchrony, although it is absolutely true, also, that America’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of the only monkeypox vaccine on the market as recently as September 2019 (millions of vials not long bought by the Biden administration), and that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is on record to admitting that rates of monkeypox infection can be higher in people who have weakened immune systems, don’t you dare ponder — don’t you dare! — ponder the possibility of its swift spread through unlikelier populations, today, because of the detriment to people’s natural bodily defences due to ongoing Covid ‘booster’ programmes, as discussed by the European Medicines Agency back in January.
Miserably, by the end of the NTI’s monkeypox war-game from last year, if I may finish, the ‘fictional pandemic resulted in more than three billion cases and 270 million fatalities worldwide’. Ouch.
Strap in tight, people, the fight for freedom is not over just yet. Stand strong, and trust your gut. And never forget where media hype and medical tyranny got us last time.
